Salman Tepsurkayev, who was abducted, is a political prisoner
Memorial Human Rights Centre considers Salman Tepsurkayev a political prisoner in accordance with international guidelines.
We have reason to believe that after his abduction he was taken to Chechnya where he was forcibly detained and subjected to degrading treatment. We believe the security agencies of the Chechen Republic were involved in the abduction and subsequent imprisonment of Salman Tepsurkayev and that his abduction was part of a campaign by the Chechen authorities against dissident voices.
The persecution of Salman Tepsurkayev, which has been intended to force him to end his public criticism of the authorities, violates his right to personal freedom and security, as well as his freedom of expression, including on social and political issues.
Until we know what happened to Tepsurkayev and the exact circumstances of his abduction, we believe he is alive. Memorial Human Rights Centre believes Tepsurkayev is being illegally detained by Chechen authorities and that the video footage of him was made as a result of intimidation or torture.
We demand that the whereabouts of Salman Tepsurkayev be made public, that his abduction and torture be investigated and that those involved in the crimes committed against him be brought to justice.
What happened to Salman Tepsurkayev?
The 1ADAT Telegram channel, created in March 2020 by people from Chechnya who had emigrated from Russia, describes itself as a ‘people’s movement against Kadyrov’s dictatorship.’ The channel publishes information about abductions, detentions, corruption and other unlawful actions by Chechen security agencies and officials.
Salman Tepsurkayev published content on the channel and sometimes, according to its administrators, acted as a moderator. He lived in Gelendzhik and worked in a local hotel. He kept his connection with 1ADAT a secret. At the end of May the Chechen authorities organised a hunt for the channel’s administrators and subscribers.
On 6 September 2020 Tepsurkayev disappeared from the hotel in Gelendzhik and he could not be reached on his phone. The next day one of the channel’s users, who had previously been in touch with Salman, published a video on the channel in which Tepsurkayev, naked and kneeling, says in Chechen that 1ADAT is ‘a very bad channel that complains about the authorities.’ In the video Tepsurkayev calls himself ‘scum’ who was abandoned by his father and insults his mother. He then sits on the bottle, saying that he is punishing himself in this way and passes the baton to other administrators and subscribers of the channel. After that, a number of other videos were published in which Tepsurkayev continued to criticise Chechen opposition activists and curse himself. His whereabouts remain unknown.
Why do we believe the authorities were involved in Tepsurkayev’s abduction?
The day after Tepsurkayev’s abduction his relatives discovered that his phone had been switched on briefly. When they managed to obtain his geolocation, it turned out he was on the premises of the Akhmat Kadyrov Police Patrol Service Regiment in Grozny. However, when the family went there, they were told Tepsurkayev was not there. The Grozny Investigative Department, where the relatives took their complaint, said if they kept quiet Salman Tepsurkayev would return home in a week. A few days later a Grozny TV channel broadcast a speech by Salman Tepsurkayev’s father in which he rejected his son and accused him of bad behaviour.
Lawyers from the Committee Against Torture conducted an investigation in Gelendzhik, obtaining video footage of the abduction and witness testimony. They established that Tepsurkayev was abducted directly from his place of work. One of the abductors showed hotel staff a police officer’s ID card and one of the two cars involved in the abduction belonged to a Chechen police officer. Administrators of the 1ADAT channel have concluded that Tepsurkayev’s location was identified with the help of one of the channel’s users, a provocateur who had offered Tepsurkayev money. Obtaining such data would have been impossible without access to Tepsurkayev’s detailed phone billings, which, in turn, are available only to law enforcement.
The premises of the Akhmat Kadyrov Regiment in Grozny is known as a place where Chechen residents who have been abducted have been held in the past and where even extrajudicial executions have taken place.
Many Chechen officials approvingly commented on Salman Tepsurkayev’s ‘punishment,’ hinting they knew who was behind it.
Further information about the case of Salman Tepsurkayev and more detail about our position is available on the website of Memorial Human Rights Centre.
Recognition of an individual as a political prisoner or as a victim of politically motivated prosecution does not imply Memorial Human Rights Centre agrees with, or approves of, their views, statements, or actions.
Die Lage der politischen Gefangenen und andere Menschenrechtsprobleme verschärfen sich von Jahr zu Jahr. Wir beleben den Dialog zwischen der russischen und der deutschen Menschenrechtsgemeinschaft wieder und bauen ihre konstruktive Interaktion, wechselseitige Information und Unterstützung auf.
Wir stellen Informationen für die deutsche Öffentlichkeit über die Situation des Schutzes von Menschenrechten in Russland und Belarus zur Verfügung und die russische und belarussische Seiten werden entsprechend über den Stand der Dinge auf diesem Gebiet in Deutschland informiert; wir schaffen einen Mechanismus zur Unterstützung russischer und belarussischer Menschenrechtsverteidiger, Opfer politischer Repressionen und politischer Gefangenen.
Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Teilnahme am deutsch-russischen Menschenrechtsdialog auf unserer Website und in den Sozialen Netzen. Ebenso laden wir Sie ein, den Newsletter zu Menschenrechtsfragen zu abonnieren, indem Sie auf den folgenden Link klicken.